Just found a solution:
(I was doing my TP visits scheduling, and needed to convert my Dynalist list to an Excel file.)
Paul Sze - Honorary Professional Consultant, Dept of Curriculum & Instruction, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Just found a solution:
(I was doing my TP visits scheduling, and needed to convert my Dynalist list to an Excel file.)
Just checked out Prezi's AI function
Again, like other AI apps (for generating presentations), the main setback is that the output is not customised to one's needs enough.
Worse still, the generated Prezi presentation is just like an unsmooth slideshow. It does not even have the features (esp zooming in and out) which have made Prezi different from other Presentation tools.
Just visited Formative again. It has been acquired by Newsela.
The new Formative has many new useful functions:
- Flashcards
- Worksheets that can be teacher-presented on top of student-self-paced;
- the ability to create lessons. In this regard, quite like Quizizz Lesson, except that the gamification element is not strong. Many content types can be inserted.
=====
I'm still using the free plan. The question types I can use are limited, but overall, that's good enough. Compared with the free plan of Classwork, Formative allows me to create classes and do a lot more.
No doubt, Formative has much richer functionality than Classwork.
But for quick creation of a simple worksheet, Classwork ticks.
===
ADDING QUESTIONS:
Classwork: Insert question spots into worksheet.
Formative:
1. Insert question spots into worksheet.
2. Add questions on the right hand pane.
Just had a go with https://crikk.com/text-to-speech/#
Really not bad, with many voices to choose from.
Resulting audios can be downloaded.
Does not have many customisation functions (eg, change speed),but for ordinary uses, this app is good enough.
My thought at the moment: NO NEED TO PAY FOR A TTS APP
Just tried Classwork.com, formerly TeacherMade
This is for creating a worksheet from your existing document (DOCX; PDF). After uploading the document, insert questions into the document.
The question itself can be inserted by adding 'teacher text'
Under the free plan, there are 2 question types:
(1) MCQ
After choosing MCQ , an options box (A, B, C, D) will appear in the document. Indicate the correct answer.
(2) Blank Filling
The blank, in the form of a word box, can be inserted anywhere. As such, this function can also be used for labelling a diagram.
+++
Then, get the Assign Link.
When Ss open the link, they will type in their name first. After completing the worksheet, they submit.
The teacher will then be able to see, on their dashboard, who submitted and their scores.
+++++
BOTTOMLINE
I think ??? has similar functionality. Classwork.com seems easier to work with.
Both require you to create a label first.
The difference:
- LABEL AS:
The email will:
(1) be found inside the Label in the left-hand pane, and
(2) will remain in the main incoming email list, but will have the label added to the left of the message.
- MOVE TO:
The email will be entirely moved to the label on the left-hand pane. It will not appear in the main incoming emails list.
There are several AI tools that specialise in, amongst other functions, summarizing texts. One example is Quillbot.
https://www.notta.ai/en/blog/ai-text-summarizer#paraphraser-io
To input the text, in addition to pasting it in, you can upload a PDF file of the text.
the problem is that the free plan of almost all these tools is very mean: it only accepts a very short text. It won't , for example, accept a PDF chapter of a book.
Just now, i tried a couple of ChatGPT apps: Perplexity, and Deepseek, which accepts a text file that you upload. They can summarise the uploaded text, for free.
Hence, to me at this stage, there is no need to pay for the text summariser apps.
Monsha is similar to Diffit, in that it can create a variety of teaching resources, especially for Reading. It seems to be a smarter design in terms of requesting a resource. The smart worksheet and the Presentation slides functions are worth noting.
https://poe.com/s/2xwjcBALyuq01T12uCZ0
My PROMPT:
Please create a rubric, in the form of a table, for evaluating the term essays written by postgraduate students taking a course on intercultural communication in the classroom. Below are the term essay instructions for the students:
"Students will critically analyse the intercultural responsiveness of selected instructional or
assessment materials used for teaching and learning English as a second language.
The analysis should be grounded in relevant theories and models of intercultural communication.
The essay should examine the extent to which the selected materials foster intercultural understanding, respect diverse cultural perspectives, and align with the learning needs and
preferences of a specific target learner group.
Based on the critical analysis, students will provide well-reasoned recommendations for enhancing the cultural inclusiveness and effectiveness of the materials for the target learner group. The
recommendations should be justified with reference to the literature on
intercultural communication and language teaching."
AFTER ITS FIRST RESPONSE, I ASKED IT TO REVISE AS FOLLOWS:
please revise the above rubric by (1) deleting the criterion "Alignment with Target Learner Needs (20%)", and (2) add 1 more performance level so that there are 5 performance levels.
| Criteria | Outstanding (A+ / A) | Strong (A- / B+) | Proficient (B / B-) | Developing (C+ / C) | Needs Improvement (D/F) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Analysis of Materials (35%) | Exceptionally deep, nuanced analysis with strong theoretical grounding; identifies key strengths and limitations with precision. | Well-developed analysis using relevant theories; clear identification of strengths and weaknesses. | Adequate analysis but may lack depth in theoretical application; some gaps in critical evaluation. | Superficial analysis with minimal theoretical support; weak engagement with materials. | Lacks critical analysis; no meaningful connection to theory. |
| Examination of Intercultural Understanding & Respect (30%) | Insightful, well-supported discussion of how materials promote (or fail to promote) intercultural understanding and respect. | Solid examination of intercultural aspects, though some areas could be more detailed. | Basic discussion of intercultural elements but lacks depth or specificity. | Limited or overly general examination; little connection to target learners. | Minimal or no meaningful analysis of intercultural responsiveness. |
| Recommendations for Improvement (25%) | Highly original, practical, and well-justified recommendations with strong links to literature. | Clear, logical recommendations with good justification; minor areas for refinement. | Some useful suggestions, but not all are well-developed or fully supported. | Recommendations are vague, generic, or insufficiently justified. | Weak, impractical, or absent recommendations. |
| Academic Rigor & Writing Quality (10%) | Flawless structure, coherence, and academic style; impeccable citations. | Well-organized and clear; minor stylistic or citation issues. | Generally readable but with occasional clarity or citation problems. | Disorganized or unclear in places; citation errors present. | Poor structure, unclear writing, or major citation issues. |
Scoring Guide:
This version maintains clarity while offering more precise evaluation levels. Let me know if further refinements are needed!
Of the related apps I have tried so far, ELMO CHAT IS THE BEST YOUTUBE SUMMARISER APP SO FAR
It is a Chrome Extension.
Go to the target youtube video page, and click on the chrome extension.
You will get:
- a one-sentence summary
- an abstract which is a one-paragraph summary
- Comments: a few comments giving 'comments' (not judgmental) on the content.
- timeline: This is a collection of timeslot summaries of respective sections of the youtube video.
- Mindmap: A summary in the form of a mindmap.
The way to create a symbaloo learning path is different now.
You start with a created webmix.
Click 'Edit.'
On the left-hand pane, select 'create learning path'.
Then there are two more things to do:
1. Click the tiles on the webmix in the intended sequence to create a path.
2. Tab the tile which will be followed by a question (MC; open-ended). Look to the left-hand pane, and click 'Add question'.
++++++
PROS
- Can utilise existing webmixes.
- Easy to create a path.
CONs
- few question types.
- in the play mode, those tiles which represent un-embeddable webpages, will not show in the play mode.
My prompt
Please create a checklist containing eight points to help students check a composition that they have written.
The result:
Here’s a clear and student-friendly checklist with 8 key points to help junior secondary students review their compositions before submission:
Grammar & Spelling
Punctuation
Sentence Structure
Paragraphing
Content & Clarity
Supporting Details
Vocabulary & Word Choice
Overall Impact
just tried Deepseek:
My prompt:
please create a rubric to help junior secondary students to assess a composition that they have written. This rubric should be in the form of a table. The two criteria for self-assessing are grammatical accuracy, and quality of content. The 4 performance levels of unsatisfactory, satisfactory, good, and excellent.
The result:
Here’s a clear and concise rubric in table format to help junior secondary students self-assess their compositions based on grammatical accuracy and quality of content:
| Criteria | Unsatisfactory (1) | Satisfactory (2) | Good (3) | Excellent (4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grammatical Accuracy | Many errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, making the text difficult to understand. | Some errors, but they do not severely disrupt understanding. | Few errors; grammar and punctuation are mostly correct. | Almost no errors; grammar, spelling, and punctuation are consistently accurate. |
| Quality of Content | Ideas are unclear or off-topic; little to no supporting details. | Some relevant ideas, but development is weak or repetitive. | Clear and relevant ideas with some supporting details. | Well-developed, engaging, and original ideas with strong supporting details. |
This rubric encourages self-assessment while keeping the criteria simple and measurable. Let me know if you'd like any adjustments!
https://poe.com/s/Wb6IS5IjoxCxHAy2mUaH
Elmo Chat, a Chrome extension, can summarise a Youtube video page directly, giving you: (1) an overall summary, and (2) sub-summaries corresponding to 5 timeline slots:
https://www.magicschool.ai/ also has a Youtube summarizer. But you first have to copy the transcript of the video from Youtube first:
我們從事English Language teaching的同工,今天利用chatbot去clarify一些language issue(例如"My favourite fruit is apples'是否OK),已經是家常便飯;那天突然想起,我們也可培養高小...